<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New Keynesian macroeconomics: Empirically tested in the case of Republic of Macedonia	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://monetarypolicy2018.weaconferences.net/papers/new-keynesian-macroeconomics-empirically-tested-in-the-case-of-republic-of-macedonia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://monetarypolicy2018.weaconferences.net/papers/new-keynesian-macroeconomics-empirically-tested-in-the-case-of-republic-of-macedonia/</link>
	<description>19th February to 20th April, 2018</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 12:37:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: MM van Wijck		</title>
		<link>https://monetarypolicy2018.weaconferences.net/papers/new-keynesian-macroeconomics-empirically-tested-in-the-case-of-republic-of-macedonia/#comment-23</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MM van Wijck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monetarypolicy2018.weaconferences.net/?post_type=wea_paper&#038;p=181#comment-23</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[14-0-2018 MM van Wijck
The statement: Money imput could not influence the degree of growth would in general be absurd.
It could be understood if money imput consists in borrowed amounts, and this interpretation
would be the most integer in conventional economy, however not fruitfull in practice. Borrowed money 
imputto introduce more robots, causing more labourlessness and still resulting in higher prices and less 
consumption could still respond to an economic law: to reach an optimal result with the least 
degree of effort.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>14-0-2018 MM van Wijck<br />
The statement: Money imput could not influence the degree of growth would in general be absurd.<br />
It could be understood if money imput consists in borrowed amounts, and this interpretation<br />
would be the most integer in conventional economy, however not fruitfull in practice. Borrowed money<br />
imputto introduce more robots, causing more labourlessness and still resulting in higher prices and less<br />
consumption could still respond to an economic law: to reach an optimal result with the least<br />
degree of effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
